Daily Management Review

F.C.A. Watchdogs Reopen Barclays’ ‘Emergency Fundraising’ Case Pushed By New Findings


03/24/2017


New evidences suggest that Barclays failed to disclose the payment made to Qatari in the year of 2008 which could make the bank a subject of heavy fines.



Barclays’ payment transaction made in the year of 2008 during an “emergency fundraising” coursing has again come under the investigative scrutiny of “Britain's markets watchdog”, whereby the latter resumed its inquiry after examining “new evidence” wherein it reconsidered “a 50 million-pound ($62 million) fine” which was imposed in the year of 2013.
 
Two information sources who were in the knowledge of the situation reported that the F.C.A., or the “Financial Services Authority”, is casting a fresh glance into the case after a period of four years when Barclays was accused of being “reckless” for it did not disclose “all its fees and arrangements with Qatari investors”. Moreover, Reuters added:
“A disclosure of new documentary evidence has prompted the bank to launch a fresh round of interviews, one of the sources said on Thursday. No further details were immediately available”.
 
The said move has been accounted under a “separate criminal investigation” carried out by S.F.O, or the “Serious Fraud Office”, delving into the “multi-billion pound” fundraising that took place back in the year of 2008, allowing Barclays to evade a “state bailout at the height of the credit crisis”. It is thought that the case is drawing nearing its conclusion.
 
According to the 2008’s statement of F.C.A, there was a failure on Barclays part to “disclose payments of 322 million pounds” which was given to Qatari investors as “advisory fees” and F.C.A. had intentions of imposing a fifty million pounds’ fine on Barclays. While, Barclays seem to be ready for contesting the findings that remained on hold as the “outcome of the SFO investigation” was waited.
 
Recently, the bank has submitted “fresh documents” to the investigators which it had earlier “claimed” to be “confidential” of being under the protection of “legal professional privilege”. Moreover, neither F.C.A. nor Barclays were ready to comment on the same. According to Reuters:
“The FCA's case centers in part on whether the bank adequately disclosed the so-called advisory services agreements to Qatari investors.”
 
 
 
 
 
References:
http://www.reuters.com







Science & Technology

Fast Company: Apple isn't the most innovative anymore

U.S. Space Program Could Be Delayed Due To SpaceX, Boeing Design Risks: Reuters

What trends will be affecting the health sector in the coming years?

Deloitte identifies main cyber threats for power industry

Zenuity To Take Self Driving Car Road Test In Sweden With Permission

Researchers: Half of Facebook users is fake

Amazon’s Ring gets in a privacy scandal

Facebook Is Creating A Stablecoin For Its WhatsApp Users

IBM offers to use the first quantum computer

Passport Numbers Of 5 Million Customers Hacked: Concedes Marriott

World Politics

World & Politics

AirHelp expects up to 33 th of cancellations and flight delays per day all over the world in 2019

Far-right and Catalonia: New elections in Spain

Trump is losing rating because of shutdown

Hanoi, Vietnam Chosen As Place For 2nd Summit Between Trump And Kim Jong-Un

US, China to hold new negotiations in Beijing

Human Rights Not To Be Dissociated From Stability, Macron Tells Sisi

Brexit Hijack Is Not The Parliament’s Right

Macedonia ignites political crisis in Greece