Daily Management Review

Face Off for Google and Oracle over Innovation Label in Android Retrial


05/11/2016




Face Off for Google and Oracle over Innovation Label in Android Retrial
A $9 billion copyright retrial has brought Oracle Corp and Google face to face in a legal battle over program copy rights.
 
In the law suit Oracle has accused Google of stealing programming which helped the latter to become the world's leading smartphone player. On the other hand Google saying it acted legally as a true innovator.
 
Copyright on parts of the Java programming language of Oracle was violated by Google's Android smartphone operating system, claimed the former in the law suit. On the other hand in its defense, Alphabet Inc's Google says under the fair-use provision of copyright law, the company should be able to to use Java without paying a fee to Oracle.
 
A jury deadlock resulted in a stalling of the dispute after it had gone to trial in 2012. Oracle's $9 billion damages request would be considered by the jury if the new jury in San Francisco federal court rules against Google on fair use.
 
Software developers fear an Oracle victory could spur more software copyright lawsuits as they are keeping a close watch on the case. The possibility of an injunction that would force Google to pay ongoing royalties to Oracle appears remote to investors and even then, they see little risk for Google because the company could afford to pay a one-off fine.
 
Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt, personally unveiled the programming language in 1995 when he was a top executive at Sun Microsystems, which invented it, testified in court on Tuesday that he always believed Google could freely use Java because. Oracle claims the software as the company later acquired Sun.
  
Google improperly used Java to quickly deliver an Android smartphone to market, argues Oracle. He had been on Apple's board and felt "strategic pressure" from the iPhone in 2007, Schmidt acknowledged when he was put under cross examination.
 
Limited use of material without acquiring permission from the rights holder for purposes such as research is allowed under U.S. copyright law’s “fair use" clause.
 
About 100,000 Android smartphones will have been activated by the time he finished his hour-long opening statement, said Oracle attorney Peter Bicks. He said that all those phones contained Oracle's property and that translated into $42 billion in revenue.
 
Bricks called it the "fair-use excuse" and said that Google's defense cannot cover what they did with Java.
 
So long as the company adds something innovative, fair use allows a company to use copyrighted material to make money, said Google attorney Robert Van Nest. He said that it was not the tiny portion of Java owned by Oracle but Google's talented engineers who were responsible for developing Android.
 
"They want all the credit for Android's success, and apparently billions of dollars in damages, but the evidence isn't going to support that," Van Nest said in opening statements.
 
(Source:www.reuters.com) 






Science & Technology

China takes the lead in quantum cryptography

Gartner: Chinese smartphones lead sales

Bitcoin Mining Worsens Global Warming Effect

Europe overtakes US by number of patents for self-driving car technologies

Samsung introduces display technology for folding screens

How retailers use technologies to increase sales

Facebook releases videochat devices Portal and Portal Plus

Smartphone makers will pay for pre-installing Google apps‍

Five loudest data leaks

Airbus announces Moon exploration competition

World Politics

World & Politics

Hong Kong refuses tiny apartments

Tumblr, Facebook wage war against adult content

Arrest of Huawei’s top manager endangers US-China trade truce

Has Macron given up to Yellow Vests?

What to expect from G20 Buenos Aires summit?

China steps up space race with the US

Climate change will cost US $ 500 billion a year

China manages to stop growth of big cities population