Daily Management Review

Market Regulators of EU To Ban CDFs & ‘Binary Options’ Sale To Retail Clients


03/27/2018


Spread-better firms shares fell as the E.U. regulators reveal their plans of restricting the sales of some financial products.



The regulators of the E.U. revealed that it will introduce a ban for the options of “binary” sales to “retail clients”, whereby restricting the “Contract for Differences” sales in an attempt to “protect investors from significant losses”, which in turn knocks off “shares in Britain’s spreadbetters”.
 
ESMA or the “European Securities and Markets Authority” informed the “marketing, distribution and sale of binary options to retail investors” would be prohibited, while the CFD restrictions will constrain the “marketing, sale and distribution of them”.
 
Without the ownership of assets like stock, currency or commodity, investor is exposed to “price movements in securities” with the help of financial products such as CFDs and binary options. According to a statement:
“ESMA, along with National Competent Authorities (NCAs), concluded that there exists a significant investor protection concern in relation to CFDs and binary options offered to retail investors. This is due to their complexity and lack of transparency.”
 
ESMA has expressed its concerns over “high-risk speculative products” offering to “retail investors” which could potentially lead to “significant losses”. Therefore, ESMA “flagged” its plans of banning these sales, as a result, the shares of “spreadbetting firms” came “tumbling” down.
 
Furthermore, Reuters reported:
“Analysis on trading in the EU showed 74-89 percent of retail accounts typically lose money on their investments, with average losses per client ranging from 1,600-29,000 euros (1,407-25,507 pounds), ESMA said”.
 
The “world’s first spread-betting firm”, IG expressed its disappointment in ESMA’s decision of imposing restrictions, as it would “risk” the retail clients to move to providers who are outside the EU. IG claimed that ESMA’s announcement relates only to “retail clients”, while the former has a client base which is “dominated by sophisticated traders”. The firm also forecasts a “lower” revenue income in the FY of 2019 affected by the “regulatory changes” concerning the E.U. and the U.K.
 
Nevertheless, amid regulation’s proposed uncertainty, IG and other firms report a growth in the revenue, whereby signing up “record numbers of customers”, which could partly be attributed to the digital currency boom.
 
Investec thinks that the said changes could slash down its “2019 revenue estimates of about 2 percent”, while the analysts at Liberum are expecting “downgrades to consensus estimates for IG’s pretax profit of over 10 percent”.  Even though, CMC thinks that “a reduction in revenue would be immaterial for the group” while it also said that the “margin changes” could impact the trading of the clients.
 
 
References:
reuters.com







Science & Technology

Tech giants face stricter government regulation in the US

Nestle's Head: Veggie meat is new megatrend

Huawei may introduce Android replacement in August

Are US high-tech investors causing brain drain in Europe?

'Russia's Google' Yandex Was Hacked By Western Intelligence For Spying: Reuters

Reuters: Chinese hackers were stealing data from IT giants for years

China's first solar power molten salt plant sets record

WSJ announces imminent start of Boeing 737 MAX flight tests

Study: Machine learning is five times more harmful for the environment than a car

Would Singapore Be The First One To Bring Lab Grown Shrimps To The Global Market?

World Politics

World & Politics

France announces new tax for air fares

Europe Concerned Over Iran Move To Breach Uranium Enrichment Cap

Singapore To Build ‘$296 Million’ Smart Next-Gen Army Training Centre

No More Sales Of E-Cigarettes In San Francisco?

US ‘Hell-Bent On Hostile Acts’ Even After Trump-Kim Agreement, Says North Korea

Italy avoids EU sanctions for high national debt

Trump allocates 4.6 bln to help migrants

Iran Says Trump’s Belief That US-Iran War Would Be Short Is “An Illusion”