Daily Management Review

Longstanding quarrel of Boeing and Airbus ends up as the US wins


Airbus Corporation has received billions of dollars in subsidies from the European Union. In 2011, the EU has not fulfilled an order of the World Trade Organization (WTO) to return the funds within six months. This a conclusion is contained in the WTO’s report published at the end of last week. In addition, the WTO decided that the A350 airliner, the main competitor of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, would never have taken off without the "direct and indirect effects" of subsidies previously given to Airbus.

Julian Herzog
Julian Herzog
Washington considers decision of the WTO as a decisive victory in the conflict between Boeing and Airbus, which has lasted for 12 years. The American side estimated amount of illegally obtained financial aid to Airbus at $ 22 billion. "We have long said that European subsidies were worth tens of billions of dollars in lost revenue to US companies," - said U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman. "This is an historic decision, the WTO finally calls on the EU and Airbus to account for violation of global trade rules," - said General Director of Boeing Dennis Muilenburg.

If the WTO's verdict remains in force, the United States will have a right to impose import duties on all goods imported from the EU. Washington has already declared that the sum could reach $ 10 billion. According to experts, one of the few ways to avoid the imposition of duty could become agreement of the parties on settlement of the claims. However, such an outcome is unlikely since so far none of the parties has not demonstrated readiness to retreat or find a compromise. The EU representative said that the Commission is carefully studying the WTO’s ruling and is considering an appeal.

The US victory is not full. WTO disagreed with Washington's arguments that support of Airbus aircraft production received from the countries where they are manufactured (France, Germany, the UK and Spain) was a prohibited export subsidy. Airbus believes that in this way the WTO recognized legitimacy of the European practice of providing loans for the production of aircraft, said Airbus’ spokesman.

The conflict between Boeing and Airbus ignited in 2004. The parties accused each other of using prohibited subsidies. In 2010-2011, the WTO determined that both companies received from the state illegal financial assistance worth billions of dollars: Boeing - through state contracts, Airbus - through loans for production of aircraft to be returned after they are delivered to customers. Next year, the WTO should make a decision on similar charges in respect of the US government, to which Boeing could not return the financial assistance, as well as to consider the EU's claim tax on benefits granted by Washington.

source: ft.com

Science & Technology

Chinese Study Claims Heart Diseases Can Be Reduced By Having An Egg A Day

Asteroid mining: Reality or fiction?

3D Printing Used For Life Saving Kidney Transplant In Two Year Old At U.K. NHS

California to require solar panels for new homes by 2020

Blockchain Enables De Beers To Track Diamond From The Miner To The Retailer

Microsoft releases Windows 10’s April 2018 Update

DNA Sequencing Project Proposed For All Complex Life Forms On Earth By An Int’l Team

Facebook may start production of its own microprocessors

Long-Term Alcohol Monitoring Could Be Possible With A New Injectable Chip Developed By U.S. Researchers

Sweden Now Has The First Electrified Road In The World

World Politics

World & Politics

The British government is trying to unblock money to pay off the national debt

Ministerial Visit From India To North Korea Aimed At Strengthening Ties

What countries are the biggest losers of Trump’s Iran decision?

World's Oldest Elected Prime Minister Is Malaysia’s 92 Year Old Mahathir Mohamad

Why Is U.S. Pulling Out Of The Iran Deal A Big Deal For The World

Merkel, Macron, May call on Iran to adhere to the nuclear deal

Arab Region Driven In ‘Wrong Direction’ In Last 10 Years, Say Arab Your: Survey

German doctors demand a tax on sugar