Daily Management Review

US is Preparing New Testing of 'Smart' Nuke


The US military is preparing testing of new nuclear weapons, equipped with modern control systems and programming. The main objective of the tests is to create charges at the power that would be more precise to hit a given target, including underground, thus causing less damage to the surrounding. However, large-scale rearmament program is already causing controversy in the United States.

According to The New York Times, the US military is ready to continue testing and development of new kinds of nuclear small capacity weapons, which passed the first test in the past year. While, according to media reports, the DPRK is aimed at creating more powerful nuclear weapons, the US military is going the other way: they want to get a less powerful, but more "intelligent" nuclear device that can be programmed depending on task and target location. The publication reports that last year’s testing of modifications to B61-12 thermonuclear bomb of B61 US Army is only the initial phase of a number of tests of five new types of warheads. Development of new versions of nuclear weapons is part of a more general program of modernization of the US nuclear industry, which could cost $ 1 trillion and will be held for thirty years.

Tests of a new type of short-range nuclear weapons, which is equipped with the power charge of programming, improved positioning system and geolocation, and control systems tail, has caused a negative reaction from China and Russia. In the USA itself also sounded doubt that such large-scale nuclear weapons program is suitable. "It's too expensive and it is not necessary", - says Andrew Weber, a former assistant secretary of defense and former director of the Interagency Council on nuclear weapons. Mr. Weber, in particular, mentioned a program to develop a new generation of cruise missiles with nuclear warheads, which plans to spend up to $ 30 billion. "The president has the opportunity to start work on the prohibition of nuclear cruise missiles on a global level. It is very important to minimize risk of conflict with the use of nuclear weapons ", - the expert said in an interview with NY Times. Some former members of Obama’s administration agree with him. Ellen Tauscher, in 2009-2012 occupied the post of assistant secretary of state for arms and international security, said that many of her colleagues started to work with expectations of a speedy reduction in the arsenal, but now they are disappointed. "We spend billions of dollars on maintaining the status quo, which does not make us safer," - says the former employee of the administration.


Science & Technology

Analysts: Google Search is losing clicks

Microsoft admits wiretapping users

French Optic 2000 unveils smart glasses

You Can Wear Your New Air Conditioner With Your Clothes

Research: Anonymous data is not so anonymous anymore

Tech giants face stricter government regulation in the US

Nestle's Head: Veggie meat is new megatrend

Huawei may introduce Android replacement in August

Are US high-tech investors causing brain drain in Europe?

'Russia's Google' Yandex Was Hacked By Western Intelligence For Spying: Reuters

World Politics

World & Politics

European Social Democrats are losing ground

Hong Kong's richest citizen calls to stop violence and unrest in the city

UK railway operators exit Interrail system

Dozens of British Airways flights canceled or delayed due to computer malfunction

China keeps importing Iranian oil in spite of US sanctions

Marijuana legalization: Did Canada benefit from cannabis boom?

Republicans and Democrats focus on carbon pricing

Iran Hints It May Swap Seized Tankers With The UK