Daily Management Review

Cisco Receives A Favourable Judgement


12/30/2015


The eight year long litigation drew to a close as federal appeal court ruled out Commil’s charges against Cisco’s infringement into wifi technology



Cisco Receives A Favourable Judgement
On Monday, the court ruled out a “U.S. appeals” stating the Cisco Systems Inc. did not “infringe a patent holding” on company’s “wifi technology”. Likewise, an equivalent judgment of “$64-million” held against the “networking equipment maker in the long-running patent dispute” was reversed in the process.
 
The litigation lasted over eight years, whereby Cisco had to visit the “U.S. Supreme Court” once, the judgement coming from the “U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit” pleaded Cisco innocent, whereby the liability of “directly infringing or inducing others to infringe a patent held by Commil USA LLC” does not lie with Cisco.
 
Expressing his gratitude on the company’s behalf, the “General Counsel” of Cisco, “Mark Chandler” stated in an email:
"The patent never had anything to do with our products and the millions of dollars spent defending this unmeritorious suit are a travesty”.
 
However, the Commil’s representative remained unavailable for any comments. Commil USA was the one to sue Cisco in the year of 2007. Commil is based out of Texas, while the court documents reveal that Commil bought the “patent from an Israeli company, Commil Ltd”.
 
In Cisco’s words, Commil is a “non-practicing entity” meaning, a company that “primarily” earns “by licensing patents instead of making products”.
 
According to a “federal jury” of Texas, Cisco was found guilty of “infringement”, whereby it encouraged “its customers to use Cisco products that infringe Commil's patent”. As a result, Cisco was to pay Commil “almost $63.8 million” as damage charges, while a judge also added an interest amount of “$10.3 million” to the previous figures.
 
Moreover, the “Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit” being the “top appeals court” in the nation that specialises in “patent issues”, asked for a “new trial” in the year of 2013. The court states that it was possible for Cisco to “mount a defense” on the basis of the company’s “good faith belief” whereby declaring “Commil's patent” as invalid.
 
Nevertheless, in the month of May 2015, the Supreme Court issued judgement in favour of the prosecution, whereby declaring the defence “not legitimate”, while “throwing out the ruling”. Subsequently, the case was sent back to the “Federal Circuit”.
 
Eventually, on the 28th of December 2015, a Federal Circuit made up of three judge panel “ruled in favor of San Jose, California-based Cisco”. In the panel’s view:
“...when it last considered the case, it did not consider some of Cisco's arguments that it did not infringe the patent. In weighing those arguments this time, the panel said that ‘substantial evidence did not support the jury's findings’.” 







References:
http://www.reuters.com/
 







Science & Technology

Airbus: Passenger hybrid aircraft to take off before 2035

Ocado To Introduce ‘Mini Robotic Warehouse’ With Standard Productivity

AB InBev’s Piled Up Alcohol Is ‘Too Good to Waste’

Ericsson Mobility forecasts nearly fourfold increase in mobile traffic by 2025

Elon Musk: We received 146,000 orders for Cybertruck

Google turns the screws on political ads

Apple to come up with AR glasses

WEF: Big data regulation becomes a problem

Israeli Firm Accused Of Spying By WhatsApp, Lawsuit Filed Against It

Google Used Quantum Computer To Solve Complex Problem

World Politics

World & Politics

Mexico approves amendments to NAFTA

Finnish parliament to vote for prime minister

Protests in France gain the greatest scale since 2010

Massive blackout unfolds in Venezuela

French And Russian Presidents To Discuss The Moratorium On Missiles In Europe

EU adopts budget for 2020, more funds allocated to climate change fight and innovation

Israeli prime minister indicted in three criminal cases

Argentina finds a way to pay off IMF loan